Aggregate district analytics on top of the Arizona Secretary of State voter registration database. We turn the public file into two report products — a district composition snapshot and a drop-off / surge cohort report — that tell a campaign what kind of electorate it is running in and what changed between 2022 and 2024. We do not resell the voter file. We do not produce contact lists.
Most Arizona campaigns either stare at a 4-million-row voter file in a vendor seat they can’t fully read, or pay a consultant for a one-off slide that summarizes what last cycle’s electorate looked like. Both leave the basic district-shape questions unanswered: who lives here, what changed in ’24, and how big is the win-back universe in ’26.
AZ Voter Intelligence answers those questions as aggregate district reports, not as voter-row CSVs. Two SKUs do the work: a composition snapshot that profiles the district as it stands, and a cohort report that sizes the drop-off and surge universes the ’26 turnout fight will be decided by. Both are HTML + PDF, both stamp the snapshot date, both rebuild from a Secretary of State export the campaign can request itself to verify the math.
The composition snapshot answers who is here. The cohort report answers what changed in ’24 and what it means for ’26. Each can be ordered alone; most campaigns order both.
The structural read on a district: party mix, age distribution, AEVL-by-party share, turnout-propensity bands, 5-cycle turnout history, and the top ZIPs by registration. Print-styled HTML + PDF, drop-into-a-proposal ready. All numbers are district-level aggregates.
Sizes the two highest-leverage 2026 cohorts for a district: drop-off (voted ’22G, skipped ’24G) and surge (voted ’24G with no prior history). Party, age, propensity-band, and top-ZIP breakdowns inside each cohort — all aggregate counts and percentages, no voter-row output.
The whole picture for one district: who is here today, what changed in ’24, where the 2026 win-back math sits. Bundle pricing is 20% off list.
Ground the district read in this district’s actual cohort math instead of statewide averages that hide the local story. Strongest fit for AZ state senate, state house, and congressional candidates.
Compare drop-off and surge cohort sizes across a slate of races and allocate field, mail, and digital resources to the districts where the win-back math is biggest. Bundle pricing scales naturally to multi-district orders.
School board, city council, and mayoral campaigns can order either report scoped to their geography. The district keys cover county, precinct, municipal, and school-district boundaries — not just legislative geography.
The reports are leave-behind ready and white-label friendly. They sit on top of the same Secretary of State source the campaign can request itself, which keeps the math defensible in a budget meeting. Partner pricing on request.
HTML + PDF report covering party mix, age, AEVL, propensity bands, 5-cycle turnout, top ZIPs. The canonical entry point for a single district.
Cohort report sizing the win-back and defend-or-lose universes with party, age, propensity, and top-ZIP breakdowns — all aggregate. Lower end for state legislative; upper end for congressional and statewide.
Composition snapshot + drop-off / surge report for one district. Most campaigns order the bundle.
Statewide drop-off / surge rollups, party-committee multi-district scopes, and full-slate engagements. The statewide 1-pager comes free with any qualifying engagement.
All engagements are one-time, per-snapshot. The VRDB refreshes monthly; re-orders at the next snapshot are priced on request for a previously-purchased district report. Statewide composition and statewide cohort views available on request — useful as committee leave-behinds.
The big national vendor files compress a lot of judgment calls into a single propensity score and a single household model. That is fine when you trust the vendor and you have a national footprint to amortize the cost. It is the wrong shape for a single Arizona campaign that needs to defend the targeting choice in a budget meeting.
AZ Voter Intelligence inverts that. The propensity bands are a rules-based scorer with weights documented in the build spec; you can see exactly why a given share of the district landed in each bucket. The cohort definitions are SQL you can read. The reports ship Active + Inactive by default. The snapshot date is on every artifact. The whole pipeline rebuilds monthly from a single Secretary of State export the campaign can request itself.
Same VRDB the parties use. Different posture toward the buyer.
This is not a voter file. We do not resell the AZ Secretary of State VRDB, we do not produce contact lists, and we do not return voter-row data to buyers. The deliverables are aggregate district reports — the kind of district read a campaign uses to plan a cycle, not the file a campaign uses to canvass. If you already have your own contact list and want it augmented with district context, talk to us; we can scope that work case-by-case. AZ only. Not a substitute for a voter-file vendor like NGP VAN, Catalist, or TargetSmart.
Tell us the district and which report you want. We’ll return artifacts dated to the current VRDB snapshot, sized to your race, in print-styled HTML + PDF.
Or reach us at robb.vaules@bluelist.ai — we respond within 48 hours.