“What issues move this district?”
A campaign that borrows national rhetoric sounds like every other campaign. BlueList’s Strategic Intelligence Reports replace that with the district’s own numbers: what households here pay, what they earn, what is being built, what is at risk — each report a district-level briefing on one issue, assembled from named public sources, with the messaging lanes the data actually supports. Twenty briefings, one family, one flat price per report in your state.
Grouped in four sub-families. Ordered singly, as a multi-issue district pack, or as a multi-district comparison across a committee’s slate.
What households pay to keep the lights on: rate cases pending before the state utility regulator, average monthly bill by district, the change since 2020, and expected decision dates — framed for the voter’s pocketbook. Doubles as race intelligence for utility-commission contests.
Rent pressure at the district level: eviction filing rates, rent-burdened household share, median rent and how it has moved, and where the pressure concentrates inside the district — the renter’s side of the affordability story.
How much of a district’s income arrives as federal transfers: SNAP receipt, Social Security and SSI beneficiaries and dollars, disability share — the district-numbers version of the benefits-cuts story, presented honestly rather than modeled.
District-level water supply risk where water decides races: groundwater trends, provider service areas, and drought status, scored 0–10 with a provider-level breakdown and a narrative that frames water security in local terms.
Environmental burden by district: fine particulates, ozone, diesel particulate, and Superfund proximity, cross-referenced with the state’s regulated-facility inventory — identifying districts carrying a disproportionate share.
Heat as a political issue, in season: confirmed heat mortality and morbidity from public health surveillance, the heat-health infrastructure that exists, and a vulnerability overlay showing which neighborhoods carry the risk.
School performance and voucher outflow: how many voucher dollars are leaving district public schools, what that represents per remaining student, and how performance compares to the state average — built for school board and legislative races where public education funding is the central issue.
Licensed reproductive health providers mapped against the district: OB/GYN density per 10,000 women, provider counts, distance to the nearest provider, and county-level maternal health context.
The flagship healthcare landscape report: insurance coverage, provider access, health outcomes, and cost burden — four dimensions, scored, with district typologies and three-lane messaging guidance.
Read the full Healthcare District Intelligence page →State-level firearm mortality context for candidates running on gun-violence-prevention messaging — every figure verified against the CDC’s own published data, with no interpolated or modeled numbers.
Treatment-access infrastructure by county — health-center density as an explicitly labeled access proxy — alongside state-vs-national overdose mortality context, both from named federal sources.
The district’s senior population in numbers: 65+ share, senior poverty, and how the district compares to the state — for candidates running on senior services, Medicare, or aging-in-place messaging.
The district’s veteran population profile from Census data — share, comparison to state average — for candidates and committees running on veterans’-services messaging.
Deliberately not a crime-rate report: per-agency case clearance rates, police staffing, corrections populations by facility, and the cost contrast between incarceration and community supervision — built for county-level races: supervisor, sheriff, county attorney.
Tribal and Native communities for candidates who need to understand and serve them: a reservation-by-district population atlas, per-tribe federal investment scorecards, connectivity gaps, and turnout trends — engagement-framed, a public-data summary that is never a substitute for direct consultation.
Federal awards flowing into the district, summarized by agency, recipient, and program — with infrastructure-law and IRA awards tagged for “what’s at stake” messaging in congressional races.
A comprehensive economic profile for rural districts the metro-centric vendors underserve: agricultural data, employment and wages, and income distribution, with each district’s primary economic driver identified.
Who employs people here, what industries are growing, where are the pressure points — employer base, wages, business formation, small business depth, and development momentum, with a six-dimension economic scorecard and peer benchmarking.
Read the full Local Business Climate page →The worker’s side of the economy: wages against cost benchmarks, wage-theft enforcement, workplace safety records, union organizing activity, and layoff events — built for union political programs making endorsement and independent-expenditure decisions.
Who is served, who actually subscribes, and where the federal build-out money is going — district-level broadband availability, subscription gaps, and construction dollars, plus the affordability cliff left by the ACP’s end.
The same discipline underlies all twenty. Where a step does not apply, the report says so.
What travels between states, and what has to be checked first.
Every Strategic Intelligence Report is the same class of deliverable — a district or jurisdiction issue briefing — so the price does not vary by which issue you pick. It varies only by where you are: each state carries one pricing tier, derived from the size of its political market, and any issue report costs the same flat price in your state. Two reports or a multi-issue district pack are quoted from the same ladder. Pricing is shared after a short intake confirms the campaign or organization — see how approval works.
These reports were developed and proven in Arizona, and each one is assembled for a specific district from that jurisdiction’s own public data — most of it federal and uniform (Census, CDC, HUD, EPA, USASpending, FCC), some of it state-published and therefore assessed per state. The issue mix is regional by nature: water risk and extreme heat decide races in the Southwest; other districts run on housing, broadband, or the safety net. BlueList assesses source coverage for your jurisdiction before quoting, so what is promised is what ships.
Not polling, and not a poll substitute — these reports say what is true in the district, not what voters currently believe. Not opposition research — that is the Race Intelligence catalog. And none of them requires voter-file data: they are built from public statistical sources, which also makes them usable by advocacy organizations that cannot touch a voter file.
Tell us the district and the issues that are moving it. We will tell you which reports fit, what they cover in your jurisdiction, and the flat price in your state.